Re: [Gems-users] Ruby_cycles varying in a wide range

["Dan Gibson" <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

Is Labyrinth deterministic?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Ricardo Quislant del Barrio <quislant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,
I'm simulating Labyrinth benchmark from STAMP into GEMS 2.0 and Simics
2.2.19 with
EE_Timestamp conflict resolution policy.
Is it normal that one simulation shows X Ruby_cycles and next
simulation, with same
parameters, shows 2*X Ruby_cycles? Is such a variability range possible?

It could be a problem of the resolution policy?

Thanks,
Ricardo

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.

-- 
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!