| Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:12:45 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From: | Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Please review coverity-driven fixes |
On 12/16/2013 04:42 PM, Josh Stone wrote: > Since the Objects and AObjects are not in public headers, I could just > try making those into private unimplemented copy constructors, and see > if anything breaks. This much appears to work fine, disabling copy and assignment for both. (At least for the elf side; I don't have other systems to test.) |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Please review coverity-driven fixes, Josh Stone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Please review coverity-driven fixes, Bill Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Please review coverity-driven fixes, Josh Stone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] Please review coverity-driven fixes, Bill Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |