Date: | Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:48:21 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Ben Cotton <ben.cotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [HTCondor-devel] Scheduler reports MAX_JOBS_RUNNING reached when it hasn't been |
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Todd Tannenbaum <tannenba@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another thought: Could it just be observation skew? I.e. many shadows are > exiting at the same time jobs are starting, and/or jobs are switching > between running and idle very quickly? > It's a good thought, but no. There were 1901 jobs in the submission and it was the only one active. The running job count ramped up to 1899 pretty quickly and stayed there. Job run times average about an hour. Thanks, BC -- Ben Cotton main: 888.292.5320 Cycle Computing Leader in Utility HPC Software http://www.cyclecomputing.com twitter: @cyclecomputing |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [HTCondor-devel] Scheduler reports MAX_JOBS_RUNNING reached when it hasn't been, Todd Tannenbaum |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [HTCondor-devel] Scheduler reports MAX_JOBS_RUNNING reached when it hasn't been, John (TJ) Knoeller |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [HTCondor-devel] Scheduler reports MAX_JOBS_RUNNING reached when it hasn't been, Todd Tannenbaum |
Next by Thread: | Re: [HTCondor-devel] Scheduler reports MAX_JOBS_RUNNING reached when it hasn't been, John (TJ) Knoeller |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |