Re: [Condor-devel] github revisited.

[Erik Erlandson <eje@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:48 -0500, Alan De Smet wrote:
> Timothy St. Clair <tstclair@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > To be more direct, "What are the limiters/detractors to moving the code base to github?".
> 
> I'd like it, but I just like GitHub.  But as far as I know it's
> incompatible with our security policy of embargoing code.  If we
> keep such changes local only it means that the local repo is the
> "real" one and there isn't a lot of incentive to to do the extra
> work to push some, but not all, things up to GitHub.


I'm not sure what embargoing code refers to, but a public repo on github
still allows the repo owner to grant particular users commit privs,
which seems like the crucial thing.  Anybody can read the repo, fork it,
make pull requests.  But only users authorized by the owner can commit.