Date: | Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:29:44 -0600 |
---|---|
From: | sparsh mittal ISU <sparsh@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Number of instructions executed in multi-core simulation |
Hello I made a checkpoint configuration for abisko, using $num_cpus=2. I ran the following the code: instruction-fetch-mode instruction-fetch-trace ...(other steps for initialization)... load-module ruby ruby0.setparam g_NUM_PROCESSORS 2 ruby0.init load-module opal opal0.init opal0.sim-start opaloutput date ; opal0.sim-step 50000 ; date ; ruby0.dump-stats file1; Here is the part of the statistics I got: instruction_executed: 141754 [ 50004 91750 ] simics_cycles_executed: 4 [ 2 2 ] cycles_per_instruction: 0.747591 [ 1.05966 0.577515 ] misses_per_thousand_instructions: 4.59246 [ 7.4394 3.04087 ] If I see the opal/system/system.C file, then the following loop in the function void system_t::simulate( uint64 instrCount ) while ( m_sim_status == SIMSTATUS_OK && instrCount >= m_seq[0]->m_stat_committed[0] ) { ...} it just takes into account the instructions committed in core 1 and not in core 2. So the core 2 has executed 91750, while core 1 has done (as expected) 50004 instructions. Is the difference right(expected). If not, is it possible that the instructions executed be quite close to 50000? I would very much appreciate the explanation. -- Thanks and Regards Sparsh Mittal Graduate Student Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University, Iowa, USA |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Number of processors, mario lodde |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Number of instructions executed in multi-core simulation, Dan Gibson |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] modelling a NUMA system, prasun gera |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Number of instructions executed in multi-core simulation, Dan Gibson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |