Re: [Gems-users] SM/OM state in MOESI protocol


Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:04:59 -0600
From: "Xuehai Qian" <xuehaiq@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] SM/OM state in MOESI protocol
After thought a while, I think my question would be:
Is it assumed that the load can get the store data by the same processor (in LSQ)? If it is true, I think I can understand the problem.
 
Xuehai

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Xuehai Qian <xuehaiq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
   I would like to know why in SM/OM state, if the processor issues a load, it can be considered as hit, and load can use the old copy? Because there should be an outstanding store to the same location before the load, and the load should get the new data, instead of the old copy. In MESI protocol, I noticed that SM cannot service load, which is reasonable. Can anyone help me? Thanks!
 
Xuehai

[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]