Re: [Gems-users] FILE_SPECIFIED topology for single cache controller

[Hemayet Hossain <hossain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks a lot.
I tried by using L1Cache as that is the name used in combined cache controller and that worked fine.
--
Hemayet

Greg Byrd wrote:

I believe the name should correspond to whatever's in the machine(...) statement 
in the SLICC file.  As Niket mentioned, the SMP protocols that use a combined 
L1/L2 controller use "L1Cache" as the machine name.

...Greg


Hemayet Hossain wrote:
  

Hi All,
I am trying to use single cache controller for both L1 and L2 in CMP 
(like the released SMP protocols with GEMS) and for that I want to use 
FILE_SPECIFIED topology. But I am not sure what name  I should use for 
ext_node ( like the traditional one ... ext_node:L1Cache:0 int_node:0 
link_latency:1 bw_multiplier:72... uses L1Cache, L2Cache). 

Can anyone please tell how to do that?

Thanks in advance,
Hemayet
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.

    

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.