Re: [Gems-users] FILE_SPECIFIED topology for single cache controller


Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:38:55 -0500
From: Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] FILE_SPECIFIED topology for single cache controller
I believe the name should correspond to whatever's in the machine(...) statement in the SLICC file. As Niket mentioned, the SMP protocols that use a combined L1/L2 controller use "L1Cache" as the machine name.
...Greg


Hemayet Hossain wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to use single cache controller for both L1 and L2 in CMP (like the released SMP protocols with GEMS) and for that I want to use FILE_SPECIFIED topology. But I am not sure what name I should use for ext_node ( like the traditional one ... ext_node:L1Cache:0 int_node:0 link_latency:1 bw_multiplier:72... uses L1Cache, L2Cache).
Can anyone please tell how to do that?

Thanks in advance,
Hemayet
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.





[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]