Date: | Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:52:43 -0700 |
---|---|
From: | "Niket Agarwal (niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Adapting SMP directory protocol to model private L2 CMP protocol |
Hi, I want to evaluate a private L2 CMP directory protocol in GEMS. Looking at some of the previous discussion it seems that lowering the network latencies and using an SMP protocol could mimic a private L2 CMP protocol. My concern is that this would not model an on-chip directory cache. If I specify the directory link latency to be 200 cycles (to model off-chip memory), every check of the sharing vectors would incur an off-chip 200 cycle access. Am I correct? How have private L2 configurations been previously evaluated inside Gems? Cheers, Niket |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] How to stop simulation automaticly while program finish execution?, Dan Gibson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Availability of Opensolaris / LogTM changes?, Enrique Vallejo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] a problem about create checkpoint, Derek Hower |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Adapting SMP directory protocol to model private L2 CMP protocol, Mike Marty |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |