Re: [Gems-users] question about link utilization

["Zhang Yu" <thuzhangyu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks. This makes sense.

Yu

On Jan 31, 2008 10:51 PM, Niket Agarwal <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you have a look at printStats in Switch.C, the utilization
percentages are for the throttles which are essentially outlinks.

Zhang Yu wrote:
> Then for the stats below:
>
> switch_16_inlinks: 16
> switch_16_outlinks: 16
> links_utilized_percent_switch_16: 8.8189e-07
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_0: 7.39941e-06 bw: 1215752192
> base_latency: 1
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_1: 2.43733e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_2: 1.6149e-06 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_3: 2.37152e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_4: 2.67335e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_5: 3.68777e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_6: 2.3806e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_7: 5.06984e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_8: 2.603e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_9: 2.30344e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_10: 6.80366e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_11: 2.35791e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_12: 1.04529e-06 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_13: 2.49407e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_14: 2.34429e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>   links_utilized_percent_switch_16_link_15: 2.97972e-07 bw: 1410065408
> base_latency: 6
>
> switch16 has 16 outlinks and 16 inlinks, so that's 32 links in total,
> while the network stats only provide the utilization of 16 links of
> this switch. In this case, what should these 16 links be, outgoing links?
>
> Thanks,
> Yu
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:20 PM, Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx

> <mailto:gbyrd@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     They're not really bidirectional links.  There are two physical
>     links, one in each direction.  The utilization for one direction
>     is completely independent of the utilization in the other direction.
>
>     ...Greg
>
>
>     Zhang Yu wrote:
>>     Thanks for the reply. I don't understand the meaning of the link
>>     utilization in the stats. Should it be the average utilization of
>>     both incoming link and outgoing link? For example, if
>>     switch0_link7 is connected to switch2_link 4, and both of the
>>     links are bidirectional(which means switch0_link7(or
>>     switch2_link4) is composed of 2 links, one is incoming and the
>>     other is outgoing). If this is the case, then the two links of
>>     the two switches should have the same utilization.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Yu
>>
>>     On Jan 31, 2008 10:01 PM, Niket Agarwal <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

>>     <mailto:niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>         Two switches connected to each other will have two different
>>         "physical"
>>         links in opposite directions.
>>
>>         But why should the link utilizations be the same ? The
>>         traffic that is
>>         going in either direction has to be exactly the same for this.
>>
>>          - Niket
>>
>>         Zhang Yu wrote:
>>         > Hi,
>>         >
>>         > I'm wondering how the intra-chip switches connect to each
>>         other. As I
>>         > understand that, when the 2 intra-chip switches are
>>         connect, they
>>         > share wo links (different direction). In this case, the certain
>>         > connected links for these two switches should have the same
>>         link
>>         > utilization. However, when I check with the statistics, I
>>         could not
>>         > find different links with same utilization. Do I
>>         misunderstand the
>>         > connection between the switches? Can somebody explain this?
>>         >
>>         > Thanks,
>>         > Yu
>>         >
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         >
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > Gems-users mailing list

>>         > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>>         > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>>         > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>         "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your
>>         search.
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Gems-users mailing list

>>         Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>>         https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>>         Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>         "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your
>>         search.
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     _______________________________________________ Gems-users
>>     mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

>>     <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>>     https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google
>>     to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>>     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gems-users mailing list

>     Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>     https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>     Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
>
>

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.