| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:22:42 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lide Duan" <leaderduan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | [Gems-users] Strange failed assertion |
|
Hello there, I encountered a strange failed assertion in GEMS2.1. I was able to run some workloads before in GEMS1.4. Everything worked fine. However, I tried GEMS2.1 today using a same checkpoint, a same configuration, a same FILE_SPECIFIED simple network (I haven't tried GARNET yet). Basically everything is the same with what I did in GEMS1.4. But GEMS2.1 gave me a failed assertion: failed assertion 'isPresent(address)' at fn Directory_Entry& DirectoryMemory::lookup(PhysAddress) in system/DirectoryMemory.C:135 failed assertion 'isPresent(address)' at fn Directory_Entry& DirectoryMemory::lookup(PhysAddress) in system/DirectoryMemory.C:135 At this point you might want to attach a debug to the running and get to the crash site; otherwise press enter to continue PID: 14318 I looked into the above function, and found that GEMS1.4 and GEMS2.1 have the same assertion. I don't know why it failed in GEMS2.1. Any idea? Thanks Lide |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Relation between SIMICS cycle & GEMS cycle, Wenyin Fu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] an error about load opal, llccdd1985 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time, Dan Gibson |
| Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Supervisor L2 cache access dominate?, Xuan Qi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |