| Date: | Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:49:06 +0800 (CST) |
|---|---|
| From: | pathscale@xxxxxxx |
| Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time |
|
Thanks.
Does it mean that even you stall a memory transaction with stall time 200000000000
It will come to timing-model again next cycle, anyway?
在2008-04-04,"Dan Gibson" <degibson@xxxxxxxx> 写道: Often, a memory stall time is not known at request-time. In this case, Ruby stalls Simics for a long long long time, but un-stalls it when Ruby determines its coherence actions have been completed. 中 国 最 强 网 游 --- 网 易 梦 幻 西 游 ,166 万 玩 家 同 时 在 线 |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time, Dan Gibson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time, Greg Byrd |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time, Dan Gibson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Stall time, Greg Byrd |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |