Re: [Gems-users] ruby results

[Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> So, basically what you're saying is to set
> NETWORK_LINK_LATENCY to be the same as
> ON_CHIP_LINK_LATENCY. Am I right?
>

Yup.

--Mike




> Thank you very much!
>
> --- Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > If you want to simulate a "CMP" with 2 processors,
> > each with private L1-L2
> > hierarchies, then just use the SMP protocols as-is
> > and configure your
> > interconnect to be really fast like a "CMP".  Use
> > g_PROCS_PER_CHIP as "1".
> > Yes, the simulator thinks there are 2 "chips" but if
> > your interconnect is
> > configured to be fast, then it doesn't matter.
> >
> > --Mike
> >
> > > Yes, it's there. Now, I get the following
> > assertion:
> > >
> > > simics> ruby0.setparam g_NUM_PROCESSORS 2
> > >
> > > simics> ruby0.setparam g_PROCS_PER_CHIP 2
> > >
> > > simics> cpu-switch-time 1
> > >
> > > The switch time will change to 1 cycles (for
> > CPU-0)
> > > once all processors have synchronized.
> > > simics> ruby0.init
> > >
> > > Ruby Timing Mode
> > > Warning: optimizations not enabled.
> > > Creating event queue...
> > > Creating event queue done
> > > Creating system...
> > >   Processors: 2
> > > Creating system done
> > > Ruby initialization complete
> > > simics> c
> > > failed assertion '!Protocol::m_CMP' at fn void
> > > profile_miss(const CacheMsg&, NodeID) in
> > > slicc_interface/RubySlicc_Profiler_interface.C:111
> > > failed assertion '!Protocol::m_CMP' at fn void
> > > profile_miss(const CacheMsg&, NodeID) in
> > > slicc_interface/RubySlicc_Profiler_interface.C:111
> > > At this point you might want to attach a debug to
> > the
> > > running and get to the
> > > crash site; otherwise press enter to continue
> > > PID: 7448
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > --- Luke Yen <lyen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I use the standard-CMP file instead of the
> > > > > standard-SMP file in MOESI_SMP_hammer.slicc,
> > but I
> > > > > still get the assertion error. Am I missing
> > > > something?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >    Can you check the SLICC-generated Protocol.h
> > file
> > > > for newly compiled
> > > > protocol to make sure the statement:
> > > >
> > > >     static const bool m_CMP = (true) ;
> > > >
> > > >   is there?
> > > >
> > > >   Luke
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gems-users mailing list
> > > > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > > > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list
> > by
> > > > adding
> > > >
> > "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/";
> > > > to your search.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gems-users mailing list
> > > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list
> > by adding
> > "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/";
> > to your search.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gems-users mailing list
> > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by
> > adding
> > "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/";
> > to your search.
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>