Re: [Gems-users] CPU accesses to L2 cache

[Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

I would expect that behavior for idle conditions -- I thought you said 
you observed the same thing for ocean?
Daniele Bordes wrote:

> Thank you for your quick reply, Dan.
> Well, I also noticed this issue in SNUCA protocol. In both cases CPU0
> number of accesses to L2 is much greater then other CPU's. I would
> like to put an accent on the fact that this happens also when the
> whole system seems to be "idle", that is, only command shell waiting
> for user commands.
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>
>
>