| Date: | Fri, 26 May 2006 09:53:51 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Functional Unit latencies on Ruby |
Mike Marty wrote: I think I can use both Ruby or opal to get this (assuming I can simulate uniprocessor on them).When using just Ruby, the "in-order" processor model is just Simics' functional execution where each non-memory instruction executes in 1-cycle. Also this assumes a SIMICS_RUBY_MULTIPLIER set as 1. You can make the Simics processor faster relative to Ruby by increasing this value. --Mike |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] GEMS1.3 ?, Mike Marty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Failed assertion in DirectoryMemory.C, Mike Marty |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Functional Unit latencies on Ruby, Mike Marty |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Functional Unit latencies on Ruby, Abhishek Ranjan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |