Re: [DynInst_API:] commit: assorted fixes, pre-9.0.4

[Barton Miller <bart@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

We can certainly turn this into a regular release instead of a point 
release.
Bill: do you want to upgrade this release?  Or pull this feature out of 
the point release?  Or argue for another approach?
--bart


On 10/19/2015 6:22 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 02:43 PM, Bill Williams wrote:
> > * Shared libraries are now consistent with executables: .o files are
> > modules/mapped_modules, and they are contained in objects/mapped_objects.
> How are dynamic library callbacks working under this?  We talked about
> changing this to report BPatch_object, but you can't really do that
> without breaking API and ABI.
>
> > If you're using BPatch_module, BPatch_object, Symtab::Module, or
> > Symtab::Object on shared libraries, *please* test this out and let me
> > know what interfaces on the object classes should be there and aren't
> > (and whether this change is a horrible backwards compatibility breaker).
> Please don't try to balance horribleness -- just don't break at all
> without exceptional justification.  Looking at the public header
> changes, I don't think there's anything here that can't wait until the
> next soname.  If you're itching badly, bring on 9.1 sooner.
> _______________________________________________
> Dyninst-api mailing list
> Dyninst-api@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/dyninst-api