Date: | Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:18:54 -0700 (PDT) |
---|---|
From: | Matthew LeGendre <legendre1@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] libcommon.so -> undefined reference to `cplus_demangle' |
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Josh Stone wrote: For the other option Bill mentioned, set cmake -DUSE_GNU_DEMANGLER=1, which makes it use abi::__cxa_demangle from libstdc++ instead of cplus_demangle from libiberty. I'm not sure of pros/cons either way. The major con to using g++'s built-in demangler is that it can't handle binaries produced by the Portland Group Compiler. -Matt |
Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] libcommon.so -> undefined reference to `cplus_demangle', Josh Stone |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] libcommon.so -> undefined reference to `cplus_demangle', Josh Stone |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] libcommon.so -> undefined reference to `cplus_demangle', Josh Stone |
Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] libcommon.so -> undefined reference to `cplus_demangle', Josh Stone |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |