| Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:07:58 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From: | Barton Miller <bart@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC |
Thanks for helping out with this Matt.Josh: ProcControl is often a minefield. It is frustrating how intricate the design gets, just to try to keep uniform semantics across different OS platforms. We've killed a lot of brain cells in the design, coding and debugging. Definitely worth getting Matt and Bill's help on this one. --bart |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Matthew LeGendre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [DynInst_API:] how much work would it be to enable binary rewrite on ARM?, Shaoyi Cheng |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Matthew LeGendre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DynInst_API:] [PATCH] proccontrol: Always set UserRPCState in runIRPC, Josh Stone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |