On 05/23/2017 04:18 PM, lejeczek wrote: > > > On 23/05/17 19:10, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: >> On 05/23/2017 12:05 PM, lejeczek wrote: >>> Is this really the best condor could do? Is this the best practice? >> If your computer actually requires selinux's level of protection, do you >> really want to run condor on it? >> >> > I'm not sure I catch your drift - are you saying something like: do you > want to drive a fast car and have it safe (just in case you know) at the > same time? > Or: this car should not be used for driving at all? No, more like: you are the only one who knows what the "better" selinux policy for your requirements is, so you are welcome to develop it for yourself. HTH,HAND -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature