Re: [HTCondor-users] config.d vs condor_config.local

[Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/07/2014 03:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:

[Sorry, misunderstood the PRECEDENCE thing]

> True, but you should only have to do it once. Future RPM-based
> installations should see that condor_config.local differes from what
> was shipped in the RPM and save new entries as
> condor_config.local.rpmnew.

It does. Can you guarantee that no condor_config.local.rpmnew will ever
have a new knob that the latest condor needs? It shouldn't -- just like
the order in which these files are read shouldn't change.

(And if it never changes, why ship it with the rpm in the first place.)
-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature