Mailing List ArchivesAuthenticated access |
![[Computer Systems Lab]](http://www.cs.wisc.edu/pics/csl_logo.gif){kind=logo}
|
Mailing List ArchivesAuthenticated access |
|
The reason I asked was when I compared the results from a Linux and a Windows machines, the output was different. The other day I troubleshoot some random jobs from one of my users, the jobs were idle for a long period of time while they were plenty idle nodes to accept the jobs. When I ran the condor_q –better-analyze, it came back with something similar to what you are posting below but when I ran condor_q –better-analyze on a Linux machine, the output was more vast and specific. That led me to check the condor_q –help and that is when I saw the –better-analyze option was gone. Alex From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Chesal On Thursday, 27 October, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Alas, Alex [FEDI] wrote:
Works for me in so much as the option is valid. The output isn't helpful in my test case: C:\>condor_version $CondorVersion: 7.6.4 Oct 17 2011 BuildID: 378655 PRE-RELEASE-UWCS $ $CondorPlatform: x86_winnt_5.1 $ C:\>condor_q -- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm ID OWNER SUBMITTED RUN_TIME ST PRI SIZE CMD 8.0 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:19:12 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.4 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:01:03 R 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.5 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.6 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.7 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.8 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 8.9 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min= 7 jobs; 6 idle, 1 running, 0 held C:\>condor_q -better-analyze 8.0 -- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm --- 008.000: Run analysis summary. Of 1 machines, 0 are rejected by your job's requirements 0 reject your job because of their own requirements 0 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool 1 match but reject the job for unknown reasons 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job 0 match but are currently offline 0 are available to run your job Last successful match: Thu Oct 27 16:32:59 2011 Last failed match: Thu Oct 27 16:58:43 2011 Reason for last match failure: no match found Regards, - Ian
Ian Chesal Cycle Computing, LLC Leader in Open Compute Solutions for Clouds, Servers, and Desktops Enterprise Condor Support and Management Tools http://www.cyclecomputing.com http://www.cyclecloud.com http://twitter.com/cyclecomputing |