Works for me in so much as the option is valid. The output isn't helpful in my test case:
C:\>condor_version
$CondorVersion: 7.6.4 Oct 17 2011 BuildID: 378655 PRE-RELEASE-UWCS $
$CondorPlatform: x86_winnt_5.1 $
C:\>condor_q
-- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm
ID OWNER SUBMITTED RUN_TIME ST PRI SIZE CMD
8.0 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:19:12 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.4 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:01:03 R 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.5 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.6 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.7 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.8 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
8.9 Administrator 10/27 16:32 0+00:00:00 I 0 2.7 sleeper.exe --min=
7 jobs; 6 idle, 1 running, 0 held
C:\>condor_q -better-analyze 8.0
-- Submitter: Administrator@winxpcm : <192.168.1.85:2005> : winxpcm
---
008.000: Run analysis summary. Of 1 machines,
0 are rejected by your job's requirements
0 reject your job because of their own requirements
0 match but are serving users with a better priority in the pool
1 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
0 match but will not currently preempt their existing job
0 match but are currently offline
0 are available to run your job
Last successful match: Thu Oct 27 16:32:59 2011
Last failed match: Thu Oct 27 16:58:43 2011
Reason for last match failure: no match found
---
Ian Chesal
Cycle Computing, LLC
Leader in Open Compute Solutions for Clouds, Servers, and Desktops
Enterprise Condor Support and Management Tools
http://www.cyclecomputing.com
http://www.cyclecloud.com
http://twitter.com/cyclecomputing