On tis, 2007-05-15 at 14:53 +0100, Alexander Dietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry to bother you again with my question, but this problem still
> persists. I have recieved so far no idea how to find out why
> condor-jobs are rejected ...
Hi Alex,
Have you checked that both forward and backward name resolving works for
the machines in your cluster? I think that every time this problem has
occured in my pool, name resolution has been the cause.
/ Johan
> Cheers
> Alex
>
> On 5/14/07, Alexander Dietz <Alexander.Dietz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for this suggestion, but the output really does not
> help me further (see below). It looks like that 150 machine
> are good to run the jobs on, but still they are rejected for
> unknown reasons! I need them to start immediately because of a
> timely limited online-demonstration for the work I am doing.
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Cheers
> Alex
>
> > condor_q -better-analyze 1082109.0
>
> 1082109.000: Run analysis summary. Of 152 machines,
> 2 are rejected by your job's requirements
> 0 reject your job because of their own requirements
> 0 match but are serving users with a better priority in
> the pool
> 150 match but reject the job for unknown reasons
> 0 match but will not currently preempt their existing
> job
> 0 are available to run your job
>
> The Requirements _expression_ for your job is:
>
> ( target.Arch == "X86_64" ) && ( target.OpSys == "LINUX" ) &&
> ( ( target.CkptArch == target.Arch ) || ( target.CkptArch is
> undefined ) ) &&
> ( ( target.CkptOpSys == target.OpSys ) || ( target.CkptOpSys
> is undefined ) ) &&
> ( target.Disk >= DiskUsage ) && ( ( target.Memory * 1024 ) >=
> ImageSize )
>
> Condition Machines Matched
> Suggestion
> --------- ----------------
> ----------
> 1 ( target.Disk >= 10000 ) 150
> 2 ( target.Arch == "X86_64" ) 152
> 3 ( target.OpSys == "LINUX" ) 152
> 4 ( ( target.CkptArch == target.Arch ) || ( target.CkptArch
> is undefined ) )
> 152
> 5 ( ( target.CkptOpSys == target.OpSys ) ||
> ( target.CkptOpSys is undefined ) )
> 152
> 6 ( ( 1024 * target.Memory ) >= 10000 )152
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/14/07, Ian Chesal <ian.chesal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/14/07, Alexander Dietz
> <Alexander.Dietz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problems when sumbitting a DAG to
> condor; before any of the jobs gets executed
> they are rejected for unknown reasons, like
> the following messages suggest:
>
> > condor_q -analyze 1076700.0
>
> Alex,
>
> If you're running 6.8.x on Linux you can use the
> -better-analyze option which is infinitely more
> helpful than -analyze:
>
> condor_q -better-analyze 1076700.0
>
> - Ian
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>
> The archives can be found at either
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
> http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>
> The archives can be found at either
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
> http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR
_______________________________________________
Condor-users mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
subject: Unsubscribe
You can also unsubscribe by visiting
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
The archives can be found at either
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR