Mailing List Archives
Authenticated access
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Windows 2000 Server + Condor
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:33:42 +0100
- From: "Andrey Kaliazin" <A.Kaliazin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Windows 2000 Server + Condor
Hi Andrew
I would not recommend you to turn off hyperthreading on P4 machine -
you are loosing on performance and multithreading capabilities for nothing.
Much easier to put this line into your condor_config.local file -
COUNT_HYPERTHREAD_CPUS = FALSE
and restart the condor service.
cheers,
Andrey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:condor-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew
> Cunningham
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:06 PM
> To: Condor-Users Mail List
> Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Windows 2000 Server + Condor
>
> Hi Matt,
> It turned out that the problem seemed to be due to
> having 'hyper-
> threading' on with a Pentium 4 CPU on the W2KServer - so that Condor
> saw two vm's. vm1 would execute , but vm2 would fail to execute with
> an error. Turning off HT solved the problems.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:46 AM, Matt Hope wrote:
>
> > On 4/21/07, Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> There was some old references when googling "Condor
> >> +Windows" that
> >> Condor was incompatible with Windows 2000 Server - I have had some
> >> issues with using a Windows 2000 Server with certain jobs hanging.
> >> Are there any known issues with W2K server + condor?
> >
> > I don't know of any issues but our farm's execute nodes
> used XP until
> > win 2003 server came out and was deemed stable (the central manager
> > was running 2000 server but not for long, it was upgraded
> well before
> > the execute nodes).
> >
> > Unless cost is a factor I would urge going to 2003 server. It has
> > several internal improvements, notably NUMA support (which
> makes a big
> > difference for multi socket opteron systems).
> > The minor hassle of tweaking a few permissions (2003 server has much
> > stricter default permissions) is well worth it.
> >
> > You of course may have no control over this, in which case someone
> > else here might have experience with condor on Windows 2000
> Server....
> >
> > Matt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> condor-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx with a
> subject: Unsubscribe
> You can also unsubscribe by visiting
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-users
>
> The archives can be found at either
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/condor-users/
> http://www.opencondor.org/spaces/viewmailarchive.action?key=CONDOR
>