[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-users] Flocking Issues
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:35:00 -0500
- From: George Gensure <werkt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-users] Flocking Issues
This can be further clarified with an excerpt from the flocking source's
schedd log
flock_to negotiatorlog:
11/2 10:56:24 Phase 4.1: Negotiating with schedds ...
11/2 10:56:24 Negotiating with user@xxxxxxxxxx at <x.x.x.x:9640>
11/2 10:56:29 condor_read(): recv() returned -1, errno = 10054,
assuming failure.
11/2 10:56:29 Failed to get reply from schedd
11/2 10:56:29 Error: Ignoring schedd for this cycle
flock_from scheddlog:
11/3 11:26:58 DaemonCore: Command received via TCP from host <y.y.y.y:9684>
11/3 11:26:58 DaemonCore: received command 416 (NEGOTIATE), calling
handler (negotiate)
11/3 11:27:00 Unknown negotiator (<y.y.y.y:9684>). Aborting negotiation.
when y.y.y.y is definitely in FLOCK_TO, and the default settings put it
in FLOCK_NEGOTIATOR_HOSTS and HOSTALLOW_NEGOTIATOR_SCHEDD as well. Can
anyone tell me why it thinks that it is *not* in there? (my original
problems with windows condor point me towards dns stuff, and y.y.y.y as
an IP will *not* resolve to anything.... help?)
Thanks,
-George