Re: [HTCondor-devel] Automatic requirements


Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:30:56 -0400
From: Ben Cotton <ben.cotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [HTCondor-devel] Automatic requirements
Since nobody said "hey, this is a really dumb idea", I went ahead and
submitted a pull request:

https://github.com/htcondor/htcondor/pull/4

I don't actually know C++ and I haven't touched C in many many years,
so it might be totally awful.

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton
<ben.cotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For discussion:
>
> I recently noticed that specifying OpSysAndVer in a job's requirements
> still results in the automatic "helpful" addition of the host's OpSys.
>
> The behavior I would expect is that specifying one of OpSysAndVer,
> OpSysLongName, OpSysName, OpSysShortName would squelch the automatic
> insertion of OpSys. (I'd argue that OpSysMajorVersion and OpSysVer are
> ambiguous enough that HTCondor should still be helpful). I can imagine
> a user submitting from a Linux machine wanting to submit a Windows job
> with
>
>   Requirements = OpSysAndVer == "WINDOWS601"
>
> being confused as to why the job never matches. I propose that the
> attributes above should be sufficient to prevent the automatic
> insertion of OpSys. Thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks,
> BC
> --
> Ben Cotton
> main: 888.292.5320
>
> Cycle Computing
> Leader in Utility HPC Software
>
> http://www.cyclecomputing.com
> twitter: @cyclecomputing



-- 
Ben Cotton
main: 888.292.5320

Cycle Computing
Leader in Utility HPC Software

http://www.cyclecomputing.com
twitter: @cyclecomputing
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]