Hi, Another action item would be to: 1) do a pull request on github, 2) write down the workflow for committing the pull request to the UW repo, 3) see how the github UI behaves when the commit shows up. Brian On Sep 25, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Tim St Clair <tstclair@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe a good action item from yesterdays discussion would be to create a account on github and give it a test drive for those who are not already on it. > > It's very low cost. > > Cheers, > Tim > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Matthew Farrellee" <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Condor Developers" <condor-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 2:43:44 PM >> Subject: Re: [Condor-devel] github revisited. >> >> On 09/17/2012 05:08 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote: >>> This is all good feedback. Please keep it coming. >>> >>> I'll summarize it and report back next week. >>> >>> If you want to reply off list, feel free to contact me directly. >> >> Here's an etherpad for the meeting today - http://sync.in/FzqZA01IVA >> >> Best, >> >> >> matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Condor-devel mailing list >> Condor-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Condor-devel mailing list > Condor-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature