[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-devel] dead branches?
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:22:26 -0600
- From: Ziliang Guo <ziliang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-devel] dead branches?
V7_7-perf_counters-branch should stay as branch.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Nathan Panike <nwp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear colleagues:
>
> The branches below have not had any commits in the past 90 days. I am
> wondering if they should be 'bag-and-tag'-ed.
>
> V7_5-SandboxManagement-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_6-branch-doc (merged to master)
> V7_6-cached-externals-publicbranch (merged to master)
> V7_6-vs2010-publicbranch (merged to master)
> V7_6-winslotuser-publicbranch (merged to master)
> V7_6_1-branch-doc (merged to master)
> V7_6_2-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_6_2-branch-doc (merged to master)
> V7_7-add_dagman_fd_throttle-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_7-blahp_over_ssh-publicbranch (merged to master)
> V7_7-credd_cleanup-publicbranch (not merged to master)
> V7_7-dataflow-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_7-ipv6-soap-fix-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_7-multishadow-branch (not merged to master)
> V7_7-new_rescue_dag-branch (merged to master)
> V7_7-new_rescue_dag-branch-doc (merged to master)
> V7_7-perf_counters-branch (merged to master)
> V7_7_0-branch (merged to master)
> V7_7_0-branch-doc (merged to master)
> master-doc (merged to master)
> master-ipv6-phase3 (merged to master)
> _______________________________________________
> Condor-devel mailing list
> Condor-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/condor-devel
>
--
Condor Project Windows Developer
