[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Condor-devel] any harm including daemon core in the includes search path?
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:10:59 -0800
- From: Derek Wright <wright@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Condor-devel] any harm including daemon core in the includes search path?
Any daemoncore daemon in the code needs to do this directly in its .
[Cc] files:
#include "../condor_daemon_core.V6/condor_daemon_core.h"
I think that's a hold-over from the ancient past when there was a
"condor_daemon_core" and a "condor_daemon_core.V6" directory, and you
had to specify which one you wanted. Clearly, that's no longer the
case.
Anyone object to me just adding "-I../condor_daemon_core.V6" to the
standard compile flags and changing the above to just:
#include "condor_daemon_core.h"
?
Part of why I ask is that I'm adding some more helper classes to
libdaemoncore.a with their own header files (stuff that depends on
daemoncore but which isn't part of daemoncore itself). I'd rather
not perpetuate the lameness by manually including the path to these
header files when I need to include those, as well.
Comments/thoughts/objections?
Thanks,
-Derek