[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Condor-devel] Re: [condor-staff] alternatives to #define for GCB support
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 18:04:54 -0500
- From: Derek Wright <wright@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Condor-devel] Re: [condor-staff] alternatives to #define for GCB support
On Tue, 03 May 2005 17:44:02 -0500 Alain Roy wrote:
> It's not that complicated!
not if you know what GCB is, and are familiar with everything i'm
talking about. ;) however, i didn't think i could assume that for
everyone on these lists.
> >- only works on platforms where we can use the GNU linker to build
> > condor.
>
> What is this list of platforms?
i don't know off the top of my head. it certainly includes linux, and
that's the main platform that matters at the moment.
> I'm guessing it doesn't include Windows.
right.
> Is GCB support on Windows a priority? A possibility?
a distant possibility. sonny hasn't even started trying to port GCB
itself to windoze...
> Is there something similar we can do for Windows?
possibly.
> Or is support Windows just a completely different problem and it
> doesn't affect this discussion at all?
that's right. forget about windoze for now.
-d