Re: [Condor-devel] Bug in condor_dagman?

["Peter F. Couvares" <pfc@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 11, 2005, Erik Paulson wrote:
> I've always thought that DAGMan should param() explicitly for  
> something like DAGMAN_JOB_SUBMIT_CMD

It does. :)

I just added this for Paolo -- as of the next (post-6.7.9)  
development release, you will be able to set DAGMAN_CONDOR_SUBMIT_EXE  
and DAGMAN_STORK_SUBMIT_EXE config vars.  (If unset, they default to  
"condor_submit" and "stork_submit" and rely on being in the PATH, as  
before.)

> or, even better, allow the DAG file to specify. (But that's a  
> relgious argument that Peter and I have from time to time, and I  
> don't remember what side I usually argue. Today it's that the  
> DAGfile should specify :)

The religious argument concerns whether a setting is a property of  
the DAG itself, or of the DAGMan process managing it.  Although the  
line gets blurry sometimes, I think the structure and semantics of  
the DAG belong in the DAG file and the operational details belong to  
the DAGMan configuration.

-Peter

--
Peter Couvares                        University of Wisconsin-Madison
Condor Project Research               Department of Computer Sciences
pfc@xxxxxxxxxxx                       1210 W. Dayton St. Rm #4241
(608) 265-8936                        Madison, WI 53706-1685