Date: | Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:50:43 +0430 |
---|---|
From: | Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh <khaleghzadeh@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Question about MOESI-CMP-directory |
Hi I have simulated a eight cores processor that contains 4 chips. Following schema shows my simulated machine: Core0 Core1 Core2 Core3 Core4 Core5 Core6 Core7 |------------| |-------------| |------------| |------------| | | | | L2 L2 L2 L2 |---------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------| | Memory -Each core has a private DL1 and IL1 cache and coherency protocol is MOESI. I have run following application on the simulated machine: for (i=0;i<5;i++) { THREAD1; // thread1 write into a large array. Size of the array is smaller than L2 cache. THREAD2; // thread2 read filled array by thread1 } I have faced with a strange result. This application have been executed on the simulated machine two times, First, on cores 2, 3 then on cores 2 and 4. I found that number of L2 miss of first run is bigger than second one. But I think number of miss of second run must be more than first one because in the second run, number of Invalidations are bigger than first one. Could you tell me how you legitimise this? Is it possible MOESI-CMP-directory was not implemented correctly? Thanks for your answer in advance. |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] Question about MOESI-CMP-directory, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] Can not compile Ruby and Opal on amd64 and no useful error message is available, Sitos Lin |
Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] Question about MOESI-CMP-directory, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Question about MOESI-CMP-directory, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |