Date: | Mon, 31 May 2010 12:43:58 +0800 |
---|---|
From: | Amy Pang <pangjiufeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor number in Opal |
Hi, I find that there is only one place defining SIM_number_processor() function ( $GEMS/opal/system/simdist12.C line 241). It is always return 1, which is used as Opal as the processor number in the system( $GEMS/opal/system/system.C line 207 ). I am a little confused about your reply. How could G_PROC_PER_CHIP (defineed by config file or reset by run-time parameter) affect the value returned by SIM_number_processor() funtion? Thanks very much. /////////////////////////////////////////////// Last reply Message: 3 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:19:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Muhammad abid Mughal <mabidm_pieas@xxxxxxxxx> To: Gems Users <gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Processor number in Opal Message-ID: <727777.3820.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" use the same ruby parameters (g_PROCS_PER_CHIP, g_NUM_PROCESSORS) to specify number of Opal processor Use same value for g_NUM_SMT_THREADS and CONFIG_LOGICAL_PER_PHY_PROC SIM_number_processor() always returns 1 because you are using single processor checkpoint if you are using 4 Opal processors (and each processor has 4 threads) then simics checkpoint must have 16 processors. Regards Muhammad abid 2010/5/27 Amy Pang <pangjiufeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi list, -- -Amy Pang |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] traffic in Garnet, VLIW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor number in Opal, Muhammad abid Mughal |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor number in Opal, Muhammad abid Mughal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Processor number in Opal, Muhammad abid Mughal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |