Re: [Gems-users] GCC compatibility

[Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Since gcc 3.4 is very old and gcc 4.5 is coming, don't you think it is
much better if GEMS developers try to port their codes to newer
versions (currently 4.4.3)? That gcc means we have to use ubuntu 7.1
(or older) or we have to place gcc 3.4 near the new one and then force
the compiler to use 3.4. The latter may caus many confliction because
other c++ libraries have to be downgraded too.

Mahmood Naderan,

On 3/4/10, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd hesitate to claim the gems-users list as 'official' support. Inasmuch as
> anything is 'supported', we use gcc 3.4.1 internally. I'm reasonably sure
> Ruby at least will compile with gcc 4.2. As I recall, Opal has some issues
> with modern gcc.
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mahmood Naderan <mahmood.nt@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> which version of GCC is officialy supported by the latest GEMS?
>>
>> Mahmood Naderan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gems-users mailing list
>> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:
>> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
>