Re: [Gems-users] Why are ocean finish times coming in negative?

["lopamudra chatterjee" <lopamudralopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Hi,

For all the parameters apart from the no of grid points and processor I am running with the default parameter.
So the 
timestep=28800.0   

Regards,
Lopamudra

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:35:40 +0530  wrote
>The amount of time taken for GEMS to execute the Ocean benchmark also 
>depends upon the number of time steps for which the Ocean simulation is 
>carried out.
>
>--
>Nilay
>
>On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, lopamudra chatterjee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running Ocean benchmark with 32 processors.
>> But the initialization finish time & overall finish time comes in negative.
>> But the correct.out file of model output has positive values althigh it is run with 1 processor
>>
>> Is a negative value wrong?
>>
>> Another question
>> The run is  taking a long time .
>> With 16 core ,4 L2 banks ,1 memory and 18X18 grid points it takes about 2 hours whereas I saw some one saying in the newsgroup that it runs for 18 minutes for them with 4 threads on
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 258 X 258 grid of integers in a 16 core machine.
>> I am running on a 1.3 ghz intel core2 duo machine .
>> So anyone has any idea why this is taking so long?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lopamudra
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Gems-users mailing list
>Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.
>
>