Date: | Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:20:54 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Mike Marty <mike.marty@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache |
2009/10/11 shanshuchang <shanshuchang@xxxxxxxxx>: > Thanks for the reply. > You mean that different L1s can communicate with each other directly through > MessageBuffers as long as they have the same virtual network number? > There must be connectivity in the network configuration as well. There would only be a lack of connectivity if you used FILE_SPECIFIED network and forgot to connect an L1 controller (or had a partition in the topology). The MessageBuffers all connect to the same network link. As far as I'm currently aware (and I haven't used GEMS in nearly 2 years), there is no way to associate different MessageBuffers with different links --Mike |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache, shanshuchang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Gems-users] addresses for L1 and L2 caches, virtual or physical?, dai jianwei |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache, shanshuchang |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] how does L1 cache with block state "S" handle Fwd_GetS from L2 cache, Niket Agarwal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |