Date: | Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:32:52 -0500 |
---|---|
From: | Xuehai Qian <xuehaiq@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] DNUCA problem |
I am looking at the NUCA protocol in GEMS 1.4.
It is a little bit hard to understand, I noticed there is notion of "token" in the protocol, is it based on taken coherence, or it is just the choose of the name of variable?
Can anyone tell me which paper or protocol is the NUCA protocol in GEMS based on?
It seems to be more complex than the original DNUCA paper.
Xuehai
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> wrote: I do not know how difficult it will be to port a GEMS 1.4 protocol to 2.0. -- Xuehai Qian Graduate Student at University of Illinois http://iacoma.cs.uiuc.edu/students/qian.html |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] failed in "CCLD ruby.so", Berkin Ozisikyilmaz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] DNUCA problem, Xuehai Qian |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] DNUCA problem, Dan Gibson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] DNUCA problem, Xuehai Qian |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |