Yes indeed. It is a problem.
GEMS detects beginnings and endings of transactions but loads and stores
are not labeled as
CacheRequestType_LD/ST_XACT.
Maybe new version of Simics is the problem. This is printed out on
simulation:
### Executing "instruction-fetch-mode instruction-fetch-trace"
[cpu0 info] Note that on this cpu, instruction-fetch-trace is
implemented using instruction-cache-access-trace with a suitable cache
line size.
[cpu1 info] Note that on this cpu, instruction-fetch-trace is
implemented using instruction-cache-access-trace with a suitable cache
line size.
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.