Re: [Gems-users] partial rollback in transactional memory

[Jayaram Bobba <bobba@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, they should have the same effect in the simulator.

cge@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> in microbenchmark/transactional/common/transaction.c in GEMS 2.1,
> there is following codes:
> //while (log_size > 0){
>         while (xact_level >= lowest_conflict_level){      // PARTIAL ROLLBACK
>
> If we choose to use while (log_size > 0), will nesting closed  
> transactions have any
> different effects on the performance compared to only using one-level  
> transaction?
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>