| Date: | Sat, 10 May 2008 11:14:39 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From: | Jayaram Bobba <bobba@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [Gems-users] XACT_BREAKDOWN_STALL_CYCLES |
The total number of cycles across all the processors spent stalling on memory requests due to transactional conflicts profiler/XactProfiler.C might give you a better idea. Jayaram cge@xxxxxxxx wrote: Hi,Does anyone know what XACT_BREAKDOWN_STALL_CYCLES means in the ruby output statistics?Thanks, Cen _______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search. |
| [← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Gems-users] XACT_BREAKDOWN_STALL_CYCLES, cge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] partial rollback in transactional memory, Jayaram Bobba |
| Previous by Thread: | [Gems-users] XACT_BREAKDOWN_STALL_CYCLES, cge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] partial rollback in transactional memory, Jayaram Bobba |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |