Re: [Gems-users] Simics cycles

[Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx>]

Use Ruby cycles instead.

divya ramakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  From the Profiler.C file I observed that the total Simics cycles 
> reported is the sum of the individual processor cycles. In a 
> multiprocessor system are the processors not executed in parallel? If so 
> why are the Simics cycles summed up?
> I am trying to get a performance metric to analyze different cache 
> configurations and would like to base my results on execution clock 
> cycles for a benchmark. Adding the simics cycles for the processors does 
> not seem to be right for this. Could someone help me out and correct me 
> if my interpretation is wrong.
> Divya
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know 
> how. 
> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_5/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/> 
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.