Date: | Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:45:10 -0700 |
---|---|
From: | "Jim Leek" <jrleek@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] Odd EL_Timestamp behavior |
I've been running though the benchmarks with various logTM configurations, when I hit one I find odd. I set the following variables (I can list the rest if anyone thinks it will help): XACT_EAGER_CD: true XACT_LAZY_VM: true XACT_CONFLICT_RES: TIMESTAMP XACT_NO_BACKOFF: false Which should mean EL_Timestamp. When I ran the barnes benchmark it livelocked. I can't think of a case where EL_T should livelock, is that no odd? Livelock evidence: 1 hour in: xact_size_dist: [binsize: 2 max: 68 count: 224 average: 7.95536 | standard deviation: 10.643 | 0 51 0 145 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 ] xact_aborts: 9164 9 hours in: xact_size_dist: [binsize: 2 max: 68 count: 224 average: 7.95536 | standard deviation: 10.643 | 0 51 0 145 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 ] xact_aborts: 14152 BTW, how did you get the numbers in Table 2 of the pathologies paper? (pathology % of total execution time.) Jim |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Error compiling Ruby, Dan Gibson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Error compiling Ruby, Abdullah Kayi |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] MOSI-SMP-directory-1level, Carole-Jean Wu |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] Odd EL_Timestamp behavior, Jayaram Bobba |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |