Re: [Gems-users] instruction count

[Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

I think the user/OS instruction counts are subject to a lot of factors. 
The 'init' process on Linux for instance is user-level. I'm not sure if 
there is an analogue on Solaris or not, but relying on instruction 
counts is not a good idea anyway for multiprocessor systems, since 
multiprocessors will often experience entirely different execution paths 
from run to run.
Zhang Yu wrote:
> I only care the number of instructions from the user. pstats gives two 
> kind of instruction count, one is from the user and the other is from 
> the supervisor, I guess the OS idle loop may increase the instruction 
> counts of the supervisor but will not impact that of the user.
> Thanks,
> Yu
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 1:47 PM, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:degibson@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     Processors will always execute SOME code somewhere -- pstats is
>     agnostic
>     to which code is executed. That is, even the execution of the OS idle
>     loop will cause the pstats instruction counts to increment-- you
>     cannot
>     assume processors that you do not assign tasks do not execute
>     instructions.
>
>     Zhang Yu wrote:
>     > Thanks for the reply. However, what I mean of pstats is already a
>     > delta of the instructions (I did the calculation myself). And in my
>     > case, the number of instructions executed by each processor
>     should not
>     > be equal or similar.
>     >
>     > Yu
>     >
>     > On Jan 29, 2008 12:15 PM, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:degibson@xxxxxxxx>
>     > <mailto:degibson@xxxxxxxx <mailto:degibson@xxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     The number of instructions reported by ruby is a delta
>     between the
>     >     initial instruction count and the final instruction count. The
>     >     number of
>     >     instructions reported by pstats is a total instruction count,
>     >     staring at
>     >     boot-time if I am not mistaken. Hence the discrepancy.
>     >
>     >     Zhang Yu wrote:
>     >     > Hi,
>     >     >
>     >     > I'm using Gems2.0 with Simics3.0.30. While I run the
>     simulation with
>     >     > multiple cores, the statistics dumped by ruby seems to be
>     >     > unreasonable. For example, when I use "taskset" command to
>     assign a
>     >     > single task to a certain processor, instruction_executed
>     for all the
>     >     > processors are almost the same in the ruby statistics.
>     However, if I
>     >     > use "pstats" command in simics, I can see obviously that
>     the certain
>     >     > processor executed much more instructions than other
>     processors. So,
>     >     > is there anything I can do to make the ruby stats seems more
>     >     reasonable?
>     >     >
>     >     > Thanks,
>     >     > Yu
>     >     >
>     >    
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Gems-users mailing list
>     >     > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     >     > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>     >     > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>     >     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your
>     search.
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson
>     <http://www.cs.wisc.edu/%7Egibson> <http://www.cs.wisc.edu/%7Egibson>
>     >     [esc]:wq!
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Gems-users mailing list
>     >     Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     >     https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>     >     Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>     >     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your
>     search.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Gems-users mailing list
>     > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>     > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson <http://www.cs.wisc.edu/%7Egibson>
>     [esc]:wq!
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gems-users mailing list
>     Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
>     Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding
>     "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>
>   
--
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!