Re: [Gems-users] non-stallable memory transaction


Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:08:29 -0500
From: Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] non-stallable memory transaction
Yes, that is how ruby deals with non-stallable accesses.

pathscale wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
I wonder how ruby deal with non-stallable memory transaction, the transaction who has its may_stall as 0;
 
For me,, it looks that ruby only return a 0 latency and does nothing else to actual simluted Cache.
 
Is it true?
 
 
 
 
 



开启健康,赢取大奖

_______________________________________________ Gems-users mailing list Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.

-- 
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]