Re: [Gems-users] non-stallable memory transaction

[Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx>]

Yes, that is how ruby deals with non-stallable accesses.

pathscale wrote:

 

 Hi,

 

I wonder how ruby deal with non-stallable memory transaction, the transaction who has its may_stall as 0;

 

For me,, it looks that ruby only return a 0 latency and does nothing else to actual simluted Cache.

 

Is it true?

 

 

 

 

 

---

开启健康，赢取大奖

_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/" to your search.

  

-- 
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!