[Gems-users] Question about DIRECTORY latency in directory protocols


Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:05:54 -0400
From: Niket <niketa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Gems-users] Question about DIRECTORY latency in directory protocols
Hi all,

I had a question regarding the latency that the directory protocols assume for looking up on-chip sharers. For instance, while sending out invalidates to all L1 shares on a GETX event, the latency assumed is L2_REQUEST_LATENCY which is of the order of 4 cycles. Since this invalidation request requires a sharer list lookup, shouldn't this latency be more ? Something like DIRECTORY_LATENCY which is of the order of 80 cycles ?

action(tt_issueSharedInvalidateIntL1copiesRequest, "\t", desc="invalidate all L1 S copies") { enqueue(L1RequestIntraChipL2Network_out, RequestMsg, latency="L2_REQUEST_LATENCY") {
     out_msg.Address := address;
     out_msg.Type := CoherenceRequestType:INV_S;
     out_msg.RequestorMachId := machineID;
     out_msg.Destination := L2cacheMemory[address].Sharers;
     out_msg.MessageSize := MessageSizeType:Control;
   }
 }

Cheers,
Niket
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]