Re: [Gems-users] Wind Tunnel or GEMS?


Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:43:05 -0600
From: Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] Wind Tunnel or GEMS?
Ruby can model NUMA timing. The issue is whether or not your operating system can take advantage of it. For the target we use, Simics thinks all the memory is on the same board, so Solaris doesn't do any NUMA-aware memory allocation. You can configure Simics to put memory on different boards. I'm not sure what Solaris will do however.

--Mike

Fengguang Song wrote:
Dear GEMS Team,

I checked the document of GEMS but was not sure whether
GEMS supports DSM or not. All the examples described
in the slides are SMP systems. I know Wind Tunnel could
do it. But since it is not active any more, I hope to
build a system on GEMS. Is it possible to create
a NUMA DSM based on GEMS? My work is to build a heterogeneous
DSM system (different CPU too).

Do you suggest I try Wind Tunnel or GEMS? If GEMS has a
different goal from Wind Tunnel, perhaps I should try
Wind Tunnel. Any advice is greatly appreciated!

Thanks much,
Fengguang
_______________________________________________
Gems-users mailing list
Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]