Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:07:01 -0800 (PST) |
---|---|
From: | "Dave Z." <zhu_dave@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: | [Gems-users] too few misses |
Hello, I'm running a memory-intensive benchmark but getting unexpected results. I've modified Ruby to filter certain accesses. In my results, I get the same number of misses with 1 iteration and 100 iterations. Even though the data requests in Simics Driver stats show way different numbers, the number of misses is the same. Could you please tell me why this could be happening? Thanks, Dave ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ |
[← Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread→] |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] (no subject), Mike Marty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Gems-users] Where to start: a different memory system, Oliver Mattes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Gems-users] TILED_Procs-16_ProcsPerChip-16_L2Banks-16_Memories-16.txt, Mike Marty |
Next by Thread: | [Gems-users] Tourmaline issues with running microbenchmark tm-deque, Shougata Ghosh (shougata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] |