Re: [Gems-users] A minor bug in LogTM protocol

[Kevin Moore <kmoore@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

G.R.,
	That's a good point.  We don't need to allocate an L1 block 
there since one should have been allocated on the first load 
or load_xact event.  Can you elaborate on the missing 
profile messages?  Thanks,
Kevin

?? wrote:
> In IS/Retry transition, there is an ii_allocateL1DCacheBlock action which
> will clear out the Trans, Read and Write bit of the cache line. So a Retried
> LD_XACT will result in Trans bit set to false. While the Read bit will be
> set when the data is received so as to function correctly, the wrong Trans
> flag will result in missing of some profile messages.
>
> I think it's redundant and troublesome to put this action there. How do you
> think about it?
>
> G.R. 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.