Re: [Gems-users] Workloads

["Mishali Naik" <mishalinaik@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks a lot for your prompt reply, yes that is what I wanted to know.
Also, how many runs of a particular benchmark like SPECJBB should be
simulated in order to converge?

On 10/13/06, Dan Gibson <degibson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ruby by default will already provide some variability due to the random
> noise it adds to DRAM access times. Is this what you are driving at, or
> are there other variabilities you are interested in?
>
> Regards,
> Dan Gibson
>
> Mishali Naik wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >             If I would like to account for workload variability in
> > workloads like SPECJBB how should I go about doing that? In the GEMS
> > -ISCA TUTORIAL slides there is a slide that talks about workload
> > variability, but I am not sure as to how should I start implementing
> > that.
> > I would really appreciate if someone can point me to how should I go
> > about doing this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mishali
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gems-users mailing list
> > Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> > Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~gibson [esc]:wq!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.