Re: [Gems-users] sparc decode failure -- followup


Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:56:36 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Marty <mikem@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Gems-users] sparc decode failure -- followup
Yes

> I just checked the stats, and I see 2 stats:
>
> Percent functional:
> Percent Correct:
>
> Does the percent functional correlate to the amount of instructions that
> failed the decode due to lack of support? And does Correct correlate to
> the % of instructions that were correctly handled by opal?
>
> thx,
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Thomas Yeh wrote:
>
> > I am hitting lots of instruction decode failure messages, and I am
> > wondering if gems handle the VIS instructions. I turned on -mvis when I
> > compiled the benchmark.
> >
> > I've seen the previous posts, and I am wondering what is the best way to
> > tune the compiler to prevent generating a lot of these unsupported
> > instructions.
> >
> > thx
> > Tom
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gems-users mailing list
> Gems-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gems-users
> Use Google to search the GEMS Users mailing list by adding "site:https://lists.cs.wisc.edu/archive/gems-users/"; to your search.
>
[← Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread→]